Identify
Flag potential complaints against your configured categories and examples.
Complaints identification and analysis
Identify potential complaints in everyday correspondence. Summarise concerns, extract facts and route results for confirmation, with structured data to analyse recurring issues.
Workflow in action
Dissatisfaction can appear in a general mailbox, without a complaint label. Identify the concern and send useful context into your complaints process.
Flag potential complaints against your configured categories and examples.
Capture the issue and relevant facts alongside the flag.
Send the results to the responsible team or system. Confirmation and handling follow your complaints process.
Adapters and APIs
Use an adapter to connect the processing. An overdue application enquiry can become a case record with a potential complaint flag, summary and key facts.
Send correspondence from a system or process and receive structured results for the next step.
No-code configuration
Build from examples without writing code. Use your own correspondence to shape how the workflow identifies and describes concerns.
Include complaints alongside ordinary enquiries, with the results you expect.
Review representative correspondence and refine the configuration.
Test new versions as categories or requirements change. Control when they are published.
Reusable data and control
Each workflow creates a structured, sovereign dataset you own. Use it alongside your complaints records to investigate recurring issues and outcomes.
Analyse contact reasons and extracted information to explore delays, service problems and other concerns.
Run in your Azure environment, with access controls, versions and audit records.
Assess identification quality, processing speed and cost against your correspondence and expected volumes.
Walk through what the workflow identifies, where the results go and how to assess them against your requirements.